The Howard Hughes Corporation (HHC) will host a Community Meeting tonight (Monday, March 25) to discuss the planned remediation of the “brownfield” at 250 Water Street. All interested members of the public are welcome to attend the event at Pier 17’s Green Room (third floor, 89 South Street).
The planned cleanup of the square-block parking lot in the South Street Seaport district has become a flashpoint of controversy in recent weeks, as the prospect of unearthing toxins from a site located directly across the street from two schools has alarmed local parents and community leaders. The parcel was purchased by Howard Hughes Corporation last summer as a location for potential development.
At the January 2 meeting of Community Board 1 (CB1), Manuel Romero, co-chair of that panel’s Land Use, Zoning and Economic Development Committee reported that the site was applying to enter the “brownfield cleanup” program operated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).
“There was a former thermometer factory located in that area and they found some mercury,” he explained. “They also found an underground tank which leaked some petroleum. So this cleanup is certainly very necessary.”
Last June, HHC, which already owns or leases large tracts of land in the South Street Seaport District, announced that it was buying an additional full block, consisting of the one-acre parking lot (bounded by Pearl, Beekman, and Water Streets, as well as Peck Slip) from Milstein Propertiesfor $180 million.
According the documents on file with the DEC, multiple contaminants have been identified in soil, groundwater, and soil gas (the air that is trapped between loosely packed particles of earth). These toxins include mercury, lead, petroleum, polychlorinated biphenyls, and chlorinated solvents, as well as various volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds.
Mercury was found to be concentrated in the soil at levels of up to 120 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which is more than 600 times higher than the DEC’s soil cleanup objective for unrestricted use of land. Lead was detected in the groundwater on the site at levels of up 725.5 micrograms per liter, which is more than 700 times the DEC’s guidance level of one microgram per liter.
The volatile organic compound xylene was found in the soil at concentrations of up 180 (mg/kg), which is almost 7,000 times the soil cleanup objective for unrestricted use of land. The soil also contains polychlorinated biphenyls at concentrations of up to 4.57 (mg/kg), which is nearly 50 times the DEC’s soil cleanup objective. The volatile organic compound benzene was detected at levels of up to 330 micrograms per liter. The DEC’s target for benzene is ground water is one microgram per liter.
The DEC’s brownfield program is designed to encourage private-sector cleanups of contaminated sites and to promote their redevelopment as a means to revitalize “economically blighted communities.” The program leaves cleanup to property owners and the contractors they hire, while providing technical oversight, and three kinds of incentives: funding to offset the cost of cleanup, tax credits, and liability relief, which absolves the land owner of future legal claims by State regulators related to any contaminants that were removed from the site during the cleanup.
The DEC’s brownfield cleanup program has become controversial in recent years because its enabling legislation originally allowed property owners to claim a tax credit based on a percentage of the overall budget for the project enabled by the cleanup, rather than being compensated only for the cost of the cleanup itself. For this reason, a power-plant owner in Rensselaer was able to claim an $86 million tax credit in 2012, based on the price for building a new generating station. That same year, a shopping mall owner in Syracuse claimed a tax credit for $56 million, after cleaning up a site in that city, which paved the way for a $561 million expansion of an existing retail complex. In both cases, the cost of the brownfield cleanup was believed to be a tiny fraction of the amount claimed in tax credits.
In response to a public outcry, the State legislature and the DEC moved to rein in such windfalls, and the program now limits participants to tax credits totaling no more than 24 percent of the overall project cost, with dollar amounts capped at the lesser of either $35 million or three times of the cost of the actual cleanup.
At a February 13 meeting held in the Peck Slip School (one of the two that directly faces the 250 Water Street site), Saul Scherl, HHC’s executive vice president, who is overseeing the company’s development efforts at the Seaport, said, “what’s really important is full disclosure to the Community Board of everything that is prepared by us, as well as our consultants. It will all be filed with the Community Board, as a repository and then you have the ability to go in there and review everything.”
He continued, “this phase is purely exploratory. There is no development going on. There is not going to be any cleanup done, to the extent that they find stuff that needs to be cleaned up. This is purely exploration and testing. And the community, as well as the Peck Slip Parent-Teacher Association, will have a chance to go and review it and see what the proposed cleanup is.”
“The purpose of us going into this program,” he concluded, “is full transparency. My position as well as the company’s, is that we take health and life and safety as more important than anything else. So we’re going to do everything that’s possible to make sure that we protect life.”
At the February 13 session, Mr. Scherl was followed by Mimi Raygorodetsky, a senior associate at Langan Engineering, the environmental consultant hired by HHC to manage the brownfield cleanup at 250 Water Street. She noted that, “I’ve been doing essentially exactly this for 20 years: investigating and cleaning up former industrial sites and brownfields in and around New York City. And I also have three young children and I live in Community Board 1, and my kids go to PS 150.” She then outlined the procedural steps in implementing a brownfield cleanup such as the one anticipated for 250 Water Street.
The meeting at the Peck Slip School was followed by a February 25 Town Hall meeting at Southbridge Towers, hosted by Save Our Seaport (SOS), a community preservation group. This meeting focused on several claims. Among these is that the lot at 250 Water Street was in the 1800s and early 1900s the location of three separate thermometer factories, and that all three of these sites were missed or ignored in Langan’s original survey of the block.
Also of concern to SOS presenters was the argument that beginning cleanup at 250 Water Street would mark a de facto start of construction on a project for which no plan has been revealed or approved. And the group also contends that the tax incentives provided by DEC’s brownfield program amount to “corporate welfare.”
In response, HHC (which was not invited to present at the February 25 meeting) circulated a memorandum to elected officials and community leaders, emphasizing the steps that the firm has undertaken to maximize transparency in the cleanup process, the safety that Langan’s management of the project will provide, and the rigorousness of oversight by State regulators, along with parallel accountability to City environmental officials.
As the controversy surrounding 250 Water Street has grown, a new grassroots organization, Children First NYC, has been formed by area residents, to demand enhanced safety measures and maximum transparency. The group is also pushing for a halt to remediation work until there is an approved plan for development at the site, as well as further environmental testing by a third-party engineering firm.